Development of type 1 diabetes in a patient treated with anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody for rheumatoid arthritis.

Interleukin-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a pathogenic role in type 1 diabetes. Therefore, anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab, used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, is considered a candidate for immune intervention in type 1 diabetes. Here, we report the case of a 73-year-old woman (HLA-DR9-DQ3 homozygote) with well-controlled rheumatoid arthritis who developed type 1 diabetes while receiving tocilizumab treatment. At 57 years-of-age, the patient was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, for which she underwent tocilizumab therapy that enabled complete suppression of her joint inflammation. A total of 17 months after starting tocilizumab therapy, she noticed polydipsia, polyuria, general fatigue and weight reduction (-2 kg/month), and was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes with diabetic ketoacidosis based on an arterial pH of 7.26, serum ketone body of 7,437 µmol/L, blood glucose level of 925 mg/dL, glycated hemoglobin of 13.2% and the presence of anti-islet autoantibodies. This case report shows valuable insight regarding the effect of anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody therapy on type 1 diabetes prevention.

Efficacy of omarigliptin, once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Omarigliptin is one of several once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is). Despite the high frequency of switching from various daily DPP-4is to omarigliptin in actual clinical practice, data regarding its efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after switching are limited. AIM: To analyze the efficacy of omarigliptin in Japanese patients with T2D who had previously received treatment with other glucose-lowering agents. METHODS: Forty-nine T2D patients treated for the first time with omarigliptin were recruited retrospectively and divided into four groups defined as either add-on or switched from daily DPP-4is: switched from linagliptin, switched from sitagliptin, and switched from vildagliptin. During a 3-mo follow-up, the clinical parameters among these groups were assessed and compared, with the impact of the switch on glycemic variability as measured by continuous glucose monitoring also being evaluated in the switched groups. RESULTS: Hemoglobin A1c levels saw a significant decrease of -0.32% ± 0.41% in the add-on group (P = 0.002). However, the other groups' variables depended on the pre-switch daily DPP-4i: switched from linagliptin, -0.05% ± 0.22%; switched from sitagliptin, -0.17% ± 0.33%; and switched from vildagliptin, 0.45% ± 0.42%, which saw significant worsening (P = 0.0007). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that switching from vildagliptin to omarigliptin was independently associated with worsening glycemic control (P = 0.0013). The mean and standard deviation of sensor glucose value, the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and the mean of daily difference significantly improved when switching the patient from either linagliptin or sitagliptin to omarigliptin. However, in patients switched from vildagliptin, not only did the glucose variability indices see no improvements, the mean of daily difference even underwent significant worsening. CONCLUSION: Administering omarigliptin as add-on therapy or switching to it from sitagliptin and linagliptin, but not vildagliptin, improves glycemic control and thus should help in decision making when selecting DPP-4is for T2D patients.

Characterization of patients with diabetes who were incidentally found to be glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody-positive by bridging-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

This study aimed to characterize diabetic patients incidentally found to be positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) in general practice. Using bridging-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we screened 1,040 patients with phenotypic type 2 diabetes for GADA, finding 25 (2.4%) to be positive. However, on retesting, with a median interval of 19 days, 44% of GADA-positive patients turned negative (Disappearing Group). The mean age at diabetes onset was significantly higher (P < 0.05) and GADA titers at first determination were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the Disappearing Group compared with the Persistent Positive Group. On initial screening, all patients in the Disappearing Group had GADA titers of <6.5 U/mL. The current study showed that a portion of phenotypic type 2 diabetic patients incidentally identified as GADA-positive were falsely positive, and that to avoid the misclassification, remeasurement of GADA is essential in cases showing very low titers.

Statin-induced autoimmune hepatitis in patients with type 1 diabetes: A report of two cases and literature review.

Statins are widely used medications for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, as well as prevention of cardiovascular disease. We report two patients with type 1 diabetes who developed autoimmune hepatitis after the administration of statin. The first patient developed the marked elevation of liver enzymes 6 months into atorvastatin therapy. The second patient developed liver dysfunction 8 months after the initiation of rosuvastatin therapy. Liver biopsies in both patients showed either portal, interface and lobular hepatitis or a piece-meal necrosis with lymphocytes and plasma cell infiltration that were compatible with autoimmune hepatitis. Then, both patients were started on prednisolone, to which they responded well. Liver biopsy is to be considered for type 1 diabetes patients if there is no improvement of liver dysfunction after discontinuation of statins.

Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity.

AIM/INTRODUCTION: Autoantibodies to the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) are a valuable diagnostic and predictive marker for type 1 diabetes. Recently, it has been reported that a significant proportion of sera in the commercial RSR radioimmunoassay (RIA) that have tested positive for GADA have then turned negative in RSR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests in patients with type 1 diabetes. The present study aimed to investigate whether the GADA result discrepancies between RSR-RIA and RSR-ELISA are related to autoantibody affinity. METHODS: GADA affinity was measured by a competitive binding experiment using unlabeled recombinant human GAD65 in 12 discordant samples (5 RIA[+]/ELISA[-] and 7 RIA[-]/ELISA[+] sera). Furthermore, the effect of the initial incubation time on the GADA positivity was also examined using the ELISA test. RESULTS: GADA affinities were >1010  L/mol in two of five RIA(+)/ELISA(-) and all of seven RIA(-)/ELISA(+) sera. After an initial incubation time longer than the recommended 1 h, the GADA titer in three of five RIA(+)/ELISA(-) sera and all RIA(-)/ELISA(+) sera increased 1.6- to 100-fold. However, the titer in 12 GADA-negative sera from healthy controls remained unchanged after the longer incubation. The increment ratio of GADA titer was positively correlated with GADA affinity (r = 0.991, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RSR-RIA test identifies both high- and low-affinity GADA, whereas the RSR-ELISA test identifies only high-affinity GADA. A longer initial incubation time in the RSR-ELISA test increases the sensitivity of GADA with the same specificity in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Development of Lobular Panniculitis Long After Completing the Personalized Peptide Vaccine Therapy.

BACKGROUND Personalized peptide vaccine therapy is regarded as a well-tolerated, safe and effective immunotherapy for patients with advanced cancers. Herein we report an exceptional case of a patient with advanced pancreatic cancer who developed delayed lobular panniculitis at sites corresponding to vaccine injections. CASE REPORT A 64-year-old Japanese female visited our clinic due to thirst and polydipsia; she was diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes. Simultaneously, she was diagnosed as having advanced pancreatic cancer; and a distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were performed. Afterwards, she received adjuvant chemotherapy with titanium silicate-1 and personalized peptide vaccination using Montanide® ISA-51 by a subcutaneous injection to her abdomen over a total of 30 times. Thirteen months after the vaccine therapy had come to an end, lobular panniculitis appeared at the vaccination sites. At this point, corticosteroid was administered, resulting in significant improvement in the condition of the subcutaneous nodules. CONCLUSIONS This case report highlights the importance of careful patient explanation before initiation of cancer vaccine therapy about the possibilities of lobular panniculitis as an adverse event. It also highlights that it is important that physicians have a greater awareness of the possibility of panniculitis in patients with concerns regarding subcutaneous indurations even long after the end of peptide vaccine therapy.